The Synoptic Gospels

 

By Keith F. Nickle

Chapter 1

Gospel Beginnings

The first four books in the New Testament section of the Bible are known as Gospels. Each of these books, in its own way, relates incidents out of the life and ministry of Jesus of Nazareth. He lived during the first third of the first century C.E. (C.E. is the abbreviation for Common Era, that part of human history which Judaism shares in common with Christianity. It refers to the same period of time as did the earlier abbreviation A.D. 1 ). According to the information in the Gospels, he was executed during the administration of Pontius Pilate, who was the Roman procurator in Judea from 26 to 36 C.E. Although the exact date is not certain, Jesus is assumed to have been crucified around 30 C.E. Where did the four Gospels come from? Why were they written? Where did their authors obtain the information they included in their Gospel narratives? The four Gospels traditionally have been regarded as written by Matthew, a tax collector and one of the Twelve; Mark, an assistant to Peter; Luke, a companion of Paul; and John, a son of Zebedee and one of the Twelve. Are those traditions dependable, and, if not, who actually wrote each of the four Gospels? In this chapter we will consider the formation of the Christian church, the gospel message it preached, the cultural contexts within which it moved, the nature and forms of oral tradition, the different uses of the term “gospel,” and some general observations about Gospel authorship.

1. THE EARLY CHURCH AND ITS PREACHING

A. The Formation of the Christian Church

Our knowledge of the first days of the Christian church is very limited. Information about the earliest stages in the life of the Christian fellowship that formed after the resurrection is meager. Actually this is true not only of the beginnings of the church, but also for its first one hundred years of existence. 2 It seems strange that this is so, especially when we realize that this is precisely the period within which all the documents that make up the New Testament were written.

The problem of scanty information about the beginning decades in the church’s history is aggravated by the limited sources. Most of the information we have comes from documents produced by the church itself. And those documents were written to meet other needs and purposes than to satisfy our curiosity about what really happened way back then. Important as it is to recognize the limits of the sources available to us, we must not become too discouraged. A careful examination of early Christian literature discloses much information to help us recover aspects of the earliest Christian experience. 3 Furthermore, scholars have studied the first century C.E. intensely. We may use the results of their study to reconstruct major features of the civilization and cultures of the first-century world within which the church developed. It seems certain to most New Testament scholars that Jesus did not organize the church as a religious institution during the period of his public ministry. Rather, the relationship he fostered between himself and his intimate followers was modeled in some ways on the relationship that existed in Judaism between the rabbi (a Jewish expert on the Torah, the holy Law of Moses) and his followers, his disciples. Yet there were important differences. Jesus did not educate his disciples to become rabbis themselves. Rather he offered them the possibility to share his own destiny—being agents through whom God’s right and intent to rule redemptively in creation was proclaimed. To that end he formed them together into an intimate fellowship of itinerant preachers and healers.

His followers regarded the crucifixion of Jesus as a tragically ruthless murder. Nonetheless they were convinced that this did not thwart, but instead accomplished, the saving purposes of God. Quite soon after his execution his followers showed themselves to be persuaded that God had raised him from the dead. The explanation they offered for this persuasion was the appearances of Jesus to them after his burial. 5 They understood and described these appearances as more than just ecstatic, visionary experiences. They were occasions by which God was revealing Jesus to them as the Risen One, God’s chosen agent for eternal life, and thereby disclosing that God was the Giver of Life. They had known and worshiped God as the Giver of Life previously. But the raising of Jesus from the dead was the manifestation “par excellence” of God as life giver. As far as we can tell from the New Testament documents, all the first Christians were Jews. That is because Jesus’ own ministry was mostly limited to Galilee and Judea, both Jewish areas. The disciples he gathered around him were Jews. Consequently the community they formed after the resurrection, that is the church in its earliest stages, was a sect within Judaism. They continued to observe and participate in Jewish cultic practices. They shared many of the convictions, hopes, beliefs, and prejudices of religious Jews. The major distinctive feature of their religious faith was their belief that Jesus was the Messiah whom God had upheld and vindicated with the resurrection. The first Christians, the Jewish Christians, found confirmation for their belief in the correspondence of their experience with the expectations of Jewish scriptures. The Jews believed that the Spirit of God had been uniquely with God’s people, Israel, from the time of the patriarchs and of Moses through the time of the prophets. But then the prophetic activity of God’s Spirit had been withdrawn. Their scriptures anticipated that the time of the Messiah would be the time when God would return the presence of God’s prophetic Spirit to Israel. The first Christians were convinced that God had restored this Spirit of prophecy as a feature of their community life.

Related to that conviction was the persuasion of the Jewish Christians that they were living in the last days before God brought this age to an end and completed God’s program of the restoration of perfection to all of God’s creation. Their Jewish heritage had taught them that the appearance of the Messiah and the return of God’s Spirit to God’s people were signs of the last days. The Jews anticipated that God would restore the entire creation to the perfection of Eden (the world when first created in perfect harmony with the rule of God). The first Christians believed that God was active among them creating the end-of-time people. They were to inherit the blessings of the new age, when God brought the age of this world to a close. They had been chosen to participate in God’s new creation, over which God would rule as in the beginning in Eden.

 

B. The Church’s Preaching

The Jewish Christian church lived then much as did any other Jewish sect community. Of course, its lifestyle did reflect the belief that God had poured out God’s Spirit on Christian believers (the technical term is “charismatic”). More than that, the earliest Christians believed that God wanted them to tell others that the end of this age was near, that Jesus was the end-time Messiah, that God was reasserting God’s right to rule. So they devoted much of their energy and efforts to preaching about these distinctively Christian beliefs. Early Christian preaching developed in two directions. The church sought to continue and extend the message that the disciples had heard Jesus preach during his own ministry: “The kingdom of God has come near” (Mark 1:15; cf. Matt. 4:17; 10:7). But the early church also increased the content of the message to include preaching about Jesus himself. Jewish traditions held that after God had created the world it became alienated from God because of human sin. God desired to overcome that alienation. God chose Israel as the people out of which to bring a Deliverer and Savior. The early church declared that Jesus was the chosen agent through whom God had worked, was working, and would continue to work to accomplish God’s intent to save the estranged creation.

Since the people to whom the first Christians preached were also Jews, they shared a common religious heritage. “Messiah” was the Jewish term for the expected Deliverer sent by God. (It comes from the Hebrew word meaning “to anoint.” Jews believed that God anointed certain agents to accomplish special tasks.) By the time of Jesus, Jewish hopes for the coming of the Messiah had been held for a long time. The type of Deliverer that the Messiah would be was disputed. Some Jews looked for a martial figure who would lead the forces of Israel to overthrow the armies of foreign oppression. Others looked for a political leader who would restore the international prestige and economic prosperity of Israel to the splendor of King David’s reign. Others thought of the Messiah as the faultless high priest. Still others expected the Messiah to be similar to some of its great religious leaders in the past—Moses, or Elijah, or another of the prophets. When the first Christians preached to Jews that Jesus was the Messiah they were using a term that nearly everyone knew. But it was extremely ambiguous as a description of the function and identity of Jesus in God’s saving plan. “What do you mean by Messiah?” their Jewish listeners wanted to know. “Is he another King David?” “Is he Moses who has returned to be with us?” “Is he a prophet of the end of the world?” So they pressed Jewish Christian preachers for an explanation clarifying in what sense they understood Jesus to be Messiah.

C. The Traditions about Jesus

 One of the most helpful ways the early church had of responding to questions from the Jews was to tell stories about Jesus. These stories were based for the most part on recollections that his disciples had of events that had happened or things that had been said during their association with Jesus. Those “stories from life” were dramatic, lively, vividly concrete ways of clarifying the meaning of “Messiah” as it applied to Jesus. The purposes for which the early church used stories about Jesus to interpret and clarify their preaching affected the selection process. Those stories which spoke most directly to questions that were being asked, those narratives which seemed to call forth the clearest understanding were the stories used most frequently. Other stories, interesting as they were in their own right, were not retold so often. Certainly some were simply forgotten. In its preaching the early church was not primarily interested in informing its Jewish listeners about what Jesus had done or who he had been. Rather, the Christian missionary preacher was concerned to describe to his listeners what Jesus was doing right then and who Jesus presently was. This does not mean that the early church was indifferent to its remembrances about what Jesus did and what he said during his lifetime. The first Christians were greatly interested in that. But the stories about Jesus that held the most enduring fascination were those stories that explained the messianic identity of Jesus and pointed to his continuing, present activity. That is what really interested them. That is what they were so eager to communicate to the Jews hearing their preaching. They chose those stories about Jesus which were the most convincing and persuasive. Missionary motives imposed a selective process on the traditions about Jesus that were preserved. Stories that served ordinary curiosity about Jesus’ life and ministry but which did not serve to promote belief in Jesus as Messiah were stressed less. Proclamation of the Easter message was intended to stimulate faith. The appropriate response was not so much intellectual comprehension as decision, resulting in a commitment of life.

It is hard for us to understand why the early church was not more concerned to preserve and pass on for the benefit of later generations every bit of information it could collect about Jesus. But the first-century world, and particularly first[1]century Jews, were not that interested in objective biography for its own sake. Further, except for the opinions of Christians themselves, Jesus was not yet all that famous. The first Christians were convinced that the last days of the existence of God’s creation in the present order had begun. They were not expecting any later generations. They had no motive to preserve every detail of Jesus’ life for future ages. When the early Christian missionary announced to an audience that Jesus was the Messiah-Christ, the Lord, that Christian had to be prepared to answer questions. “Jesus” was a fairly common name. Which “Jesus” was meant? “Messiah” was a title having several meanings. What kind of “messiah” was the person talking about? “Lord” was a term that could encompass anything from a polite form of address to implications of divinity. What was the nature and source of the lordly authority of Jesus? Traditions about his birth, his home, his family helped to distinguish which “Jesus” the preacher was talking about. The genealogies, the allusions to scriptural descriptions of the Davidic messiah, of the Suffering One of God, of the Moses servant-prophet served to explain the content of “Messiah.” Stories about Jesus’ driving out demons or performing nature miracles, or stories of his baptism and transfiguration, served to illustrate that the source of his lordly authority was God.

As we have seen, Christian preaching that began in two directions soon merged those directions. The early church combined the message that Jesus had preached of the reestablishment of God’s royal rule in creation with its own preaching of Jesus as the Messiah. In the person and activity of the Messiah, Jesus (or “the Christ, Jesus”—”Christ” is the Greek equivalent to the Hebrew “Messiah”), God again rules over creation. God has demonstrated the reality of God’s rule by raising Jesus from the dead after a hostile creation destroyed him. Jews who heard such Christian preaching were often shocked and appalled. If the Christian claims were true, why was it necessary for the Christ to suffer and be condemned to die on a cross? Why had the Jewish religious leaders, the representatives of God’s own people, judged the Messiah of God to be guilty of blasphemy? How could it be that God would allow such an unjust tragedy to occur? To respond to such protests the Jewish Christians appealed to certain passages in Jewish scriptures. The Law and the Prophets foretold the fate of Jesus. Many of the events in his life were foreshadowed in the Jewish scriptures. The incidents that occurred during the last days of Jesus in Jerusalem were especially significant in this regard. Think of all the events in those final days that the church believed were in fulfillment of inspired scripture. They included Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem, the cleansing of the Temple, the amount of money Judas received to betray Jesus, the use to which that money was finally put, Jesus’ betrayal, his condemnation, the desertion by his disciples, his arrest, trial, crucifixion, and resurrection.

All these moments in the Passion of Jesus fulfilled prophecies in the Jewish scriptures. These scriptural predictions were weighty evidence that God was revealing Jesus as the Messiah through his death and resurrection. The Jewish scriptures testified that God had already revealed through the prophets that God intended to accomplish God’s saving purposes in this manner.

To read full article visit here.