" 84CD6F076EBF75325F380D8209373AE1 Women in the Theology of the Church Fathers

Ticker

6/recent/ticker-posts

Women in the Theology of the Church Fathers



Introduction

Women were oppressed, marginalized and dominated in a male-centered world. In a patriarchal society, men are seen as superior, stronger and more rational than women and that God created men to dominate. In the same patriarchal society, women are considered deviant, incomplete, physically crippled, emotionally dependent, unstable, naturally weaker, unintelligent, and rationally inferior. In short, patriarchal is a system in which women experience discrimination, subordination, and physical, mental, and spiritual violence, as well as abuse and oppression.

We cannot deny or ignore that patriarchy exists, and from a feminist perspective, patriarchy as a system is intrinsically evil. The Church Fathers and their views on women were substantially and significantly influenced by philosophical voices such as Aristotle and Plato, among others. The uniform teaching of ancient philosophers and rhetoricians was that women were naturally inferior to men in every respect.

1. Some views of the early church fathers on women

 Tertullian of Carthage in the Roman province of Africa (155-240 AD). Although he has been called the father of Latin Christianity, he was the son of a centurion in the proconsular service and was a pagan until he was 40, indulging his passions as he saw fit. He became a Christian after witnessing the courageous martyrdom of ordinary Christians in the Roman games. Soon after, he became a priest in a church in Carthage. At some point, he became disenchanted with the church because of what he saw as compromise and joined the more ascetic Montanist sect. Yet he is known for defending the church against heresy (namely Christian Gnosticism), paganism, and persecution. He is also credited with being the first to use the term "Trinity" (Latin: trinity) when discussing the nature of God.

John Chrysostom (349-407 AD) was Archbishop of Constantinople in 397-403. He was one of the most prolific writers of the early Christian church, second only to Augustine. He is the main representative of the exegetical principles of the School of Antioch, which used a grammatical-historical method of interpretation in contrast to the allegorical and mystical methods of interpretation of Origen and the Alexandrian school. Interestingly, Chrysostom here argued that the subordination of women and the restriction of women to teach men was a direct result of Eve's sin. He was referring to the curse in Genesis 3, which he understood to mean that the wife was subject to her husband, but then extrapolated it to women being subject to men in general. His statement, "She hasn't been told yet," indicated his understanding that this was the result of the fall. In other words, he did not claim that this hierarchical arrangement was based on a created order. He expressed this explicitly by arguing that women are now subject to men because Eve misused her equality with Adam.

Ambrose, bishop of Milan from 374-397 AD, is remembered for baptizing Augustine, successfully combating Arianism (a heresy that denied the divinity of Jesus Christ), opposing several emperors, and teaching on a wide range of subjects, including the Old Testament, congregational singing, the incarnation of Jesus, the Holy Spirit and Christian ethics.

Augustine of Hippo (354-430 AD) is considered one of the most important Church Fathers of the Latin Church because his theological, anthropological, philosophical and sociological writings influenced the development of Western Christianity. Even those who have never read any of his works have most likely heard the following quote from Confessions: “You made us for yourself, Lord, and our heart is restless until it finds its rest in you. I heard it just three months ago in the introductory Sunday school lesson on Ecclesiastes.

If it were not that woman was created to be man's helper specifically for the production of children, then why was she created as a 'helper' (Gen 2:18)? Was it so she could work the land with him? No, because there was no such job yet for which he needed a helper, and even if he did require such a job, a man would be a better helper. It can also be assumed that the reason for her creation as a helper had something to do with the company she could provide the man if he was perhaps bored with his solitude. But for company and conversation, how much more pleasant is it for two male friends to live together than for a man and a woman.

Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274 Advertisement) is considered one of the most noteworthy Christian masterminds and logicians in history. In his masterpiece Summa Theological he completed the classical systematization of Latin theology. Bible teachers say these words often and with great respect. In the same lesson on Ecclesiastes, the Sunday school teacher who quoted Augustine (above) also quoted from the Summa Theological: “It is impossible for any created good to constitute human happiness... This is not to be found in any creature but in God Himself. The Summa remains required reading for many seminary students in the Catholic Church, the Orthodox Church, and most Protestant denominations. For this reason, he remains very influential.

 As far as individual nature is concerned, the woman is defective and misbegotten, for the active force in the male seed tends to produce the perfect form in the male sex; while the production of woman arises from a defect in the active power, or from some material indisposition, or even from some external influence; such as the south wind, which is moist, as the Philosopher observes. On the other hand, as regards human nature in general, woman is not wrongly begotten, but is included in the design of nature as it tends to the work of generation. Now the general design of nature depends upon God, who is the universal Author of nature. Therefore, when creating nature, God created not only man, but also woman.[1]

What role did women play in the early days of the church?

i. As leaders and evangelists in house churches, women played a vital role in early Christianity. House churches, the early church's primary channels of sustainability, were funded and led by women such as Lydia (Acts 16:11-40), Nympha (Col. 4:15), and Mary, the mother of John Mark (Acts 12:12). In 1 Thess. 5:12 Paul indicates that such house church leaders had significant authority when he tells his readers to be thankful for those who "care for you in the Lord." In both Jewish and Greco-Roman cultures, women did not always have equal access or rights in the public sphere, so the home was the most socially acceptable and supported place for women to speak, teach, and take responsibility. It was in this household context that the Church was brought up to childhood.

ii. As the Church gained legal status in Roman society, it became increasingly subservient to the patriarchal ideology of the dominant culture. Women who no longer nurtured the church in their homes were increasingly marginalized—even banned from church grounds if they happened to be menstruating (HS. 16). As the church adopted more hierarchical structures in the 4th century, positions at the top became open only to men, as female bishops or presbyters would have gone against Roman gender ideology.

Women are often not seen as wives (Romans 16; Philippians 4:2), apostles (Romans 16:7), and prophets (Acts 21:9; Revelation 2:20) and are often forced to find and fulfill other roles. . As Barbara MachHaffie notes, "Most historians agree that women played a decisive role in the creation of the Church, and women played a much more decisive role in the first generation of Christianity than in subsequent centuries." The role is more important. [2]

Women in the Age of the Church Fathers

The Church Fathers' view of women and what it means to be a woman was influenced by the anthropology of late antiquity and the common Judeo-Christian tradition. Despite the fact that women were considered the weaker sex, there were women who followed their own unique path and did not conform to the Church's ideal of womanhood.

During the period of the Church Fathers, theological writings and influence of women were very limited. Nevertheless, women significantly influenced the activities of priests, bishops, church teachers, brothers, husbands, fathers and male contemporaries. The women of the ancient church had few opportunities to make their voices heard; however, they lived the gospel message in such a radical way that male theologians could not close their eyes and through their theological works even the deaf were given a voice.

While the voices of these Christian women are heard today only through the writings of male authors, they should not be overlooked or ignored. Their significance should not be relegated to the darkness of history, but challenge us today. Church mothers cannot be spoken of in the same sense as church fathers. There is not and will not be a discipline called "patristics" if patristics is understood only as a parallel to patristics. Such discipline will appear only when our eyes are opened to those women who have left their mark on the Church in their own way and thus deserve the title of Mothers of the Church.[3]

 

Conclusion

While Tertullian in his work On the Apparel of Women (1, 1-2) spoke of women as "the devil's gate" (1, 1-2), it is not unusual to find many other enthusiastic expressions regarding women (Forrester, 1975: 83 -101). consists of two consubstantial forms, namely masculine and feminine. These, in Tertullian's view, are fundamentally identical in their humanity. Despite Tertullian's belief that women are often depraved and as narcissistic as he describes, he is fully aware that they are nevertheless God's creation. Gender differences are largely the result of a process of cultural conditioning that has taken place over many centuries. When we consider what role women should play in churches today, we cannot afford to base our decisions on past practices that were based on incongruent evidence based on thinking that prevailed in a very unique and different sociocultural context. Nor can we afford to rely too much on tradition, although it is an important substratum on which to build a building for the Lord. The debate about the role of women in the church has not stopped. For those who see faith as a critical element of life, this debate creates many tensions on a number of levels including spiritual, existential and intellectual. Women cannot forever be condemned as women of lesser value in ecclesiastical matters, although there are many aspects against ordination as such that cannot be refuted if biblical exegesis is true in itself. However, a preliminary examination of Tertullian's treatises points to a conclusion that operates in a distinctly African setting, which immediately makes it difficult for us to compare his beliefs with those of other early church fathers. Tertullian's conclusions require closer examination and a more extensive discursive analysis, which should consider all his texts in much more detail.

 


[1]Judy Wu Dominick, How Some of the Early Church Fathers’ Views on Women Affect Us Today, hppts://lifeconsiderd.com/.Accessed on  09.08.21.

[2] Michael Wiltshire,”More than Footnotes Part 1:Women in Early Church History.”https://juniaproject.com/more-than-footnotes-part-1-women-early-church/.Accessed on 09.08.21.

[3]  Dr. Ruth Albrecht, Women in the time of the church fathers: hppts:// Accessed on 09.08.21.

Post a Comment

0 Comments